Thursday, 21 February 2008
Essay writing - pros and cons of a ban on violent scenes in movies
There are three major arguments from people who are against such a ban:
Firstly, we don't turn into a non-violent society just because we don't show violence in movies - because violence is everywhere! Secondly, most of the films shown in cinemas or on tv are so unrealistic that a normal person wouldn't copy or imitate those (mostly total nonsensical) violent- scenes they saw in films. And thirdly, according to researches and surveys, the majority of the people doesn't get violent just because they watch such films.
But there are also powerful arguments wich are in favour to a ban on violence in movies. Firstly, there are also many very good non-violent films which are sucessfull too. Maybe because so much violence, how it's shown in most of the films today, isn't realistic anymore! Secondly, it's proved that exactly violent movies have got an extremely high influence on people, especially on children under twelve years. They unconsciously become more and more violent to others. Thirdly, the imitation of violent scenes e.g. if ther's a amok-run shown in a film, the viewers maybe think of violence as a solution!
Finally, I can't imagine a general ban on violence in movies. In the majority of cases violence has got a negative influence on us, and I would wish, there would be stricter censorships of violent scenes, but I unfortunately think, it's already to late for making a general ban on violent movies.
Wednesday, 12 December 2007
SNOW FALLING ON CEDARS : All the evidence against the accused Kabuo Miyamoto
He's a Japanese-American fisherman on trial for the murderer of another fisherman, a white man, named Carl Heine. All the people there assume that Carl was the victime of a murder.
A trial followed in which the community an the court want to discover the true causes of the victims death. Kabuo, the father of three children, is in the dock. Of particular increst in the trial is a batterey that was found on the boat of the death - what wouldn't be extraordinary; but they found out that it's definitely not that type of battery Carl uses normally, it's of course the type of battery Kabuo uses on his boat! Which naturally lead to a motive for Kabuo. By examining the corpse it became sure that Carl died from drowning but they found no appearances for an agony. They also noticed a strange wound on Carls head, which looked quite similar to wounds they noticed during the war against Japanese soldiers which used kendo - an art of stick fighting, and Kabuo was known as one of the best kendo fighters on the whole island.
But also others had motives to be the murderer. For example his wife or the racist mother of Carl. Many years ago, Kabuos parents leased acre from the Heines but because of the war they weren't able to pay the last two rates and so the Heines reclaimed their acre. There was still a conflict between them - but one day before the victims death, Kabuo said that Carl has already agreed with selling the acre to him (Kabuo). But afterwards, by searching the boat of Kabuo the sheriff discovers a blood-covered gaff - Kabuo got arrested directely!
The relatively rare type of blood matched with Carl Heines. Kabuos type is 0 negative and so they suspectet that the gaff could be the weapon that caused Carls headwound.
Now Kabuo was definitely decried as a murderer. But there was the reporter Ishmael Chambers, the school day friend of Kabuos wife Hatsue. He found out that it wasn't a murder and although Hatsue said she hates him, he helped them, told the court the true story and that Kabuo didn't told the truth from the beginning on out of fear of being judged unfairly because he's Japanese. All the evidence against Kabuo were a contretemps, it wasn't a murder.
It was a accident. Carl Heine had tied a latern to his mast because there was no electricitiy; but then a wave came and he fall off the mast.
So Kabuo, by contrast, was the villain but also the victim of the story. In the end the new facts changed the original evidence, the truth came out and Kabuo was acquitted of the murder.
Thursday, 29 November 2007
Correction of the first exam
For me art is something, which conveys feelings, emotions. I think art is something quite relative, something you can't really describe. Yet, I think that nevertheless not everything can be art.
I don't think that this picture is art. Maybe it's art for some people, but not for me!
I think that art has to be something that not everyone is able to do. It's the same as when you cook something: not everyone has got the talent to cook but anywhere there surely is a person who likes the meal. I think that's quite comparable with art. It's very alike. For my taste, there aren't enough points in the picture, which you can think about. It's nothing special to me. It's a photo that anyone could take and so it isn't art for me!
Friday, 16 November 2007
Life after death...? What happens when we die???
I'm really glad that we CAN die and that we don't have to live forever and so I'm absolutely not scared about death, but maybe a little bit scared about how we're going to die.
For me the perfekt way of dying would be to softly fall asleep and never wake up again!
Tuesday, 25 September 2007
I read this article about and I briefly want to say my opinion about it and about art common. I principle think that art is difficult to describe.
Art is something different for everyone and so I think that you can't really say, whether an artwork is justified to be exhibit in an art museum, or not!
I mean, nowadays there are so many artists in the world and they all use different kinds of materials.
Sometimes they create things, which often lead to row and controversial actions (like the row between the British museum and R. Giuliani)!
When they use excrements or blood, not everybody thinks that that’s ok.
There are art exhibitions, museums and shocked people who don't accept such "creations".
On the other hand, there are people, who say that's a restriction of artistic liberty!
So what’s art and what’s not art?
Yours Anja
Wednesday, 2 May 2007
MY FIRST LOVE
It was the time when I worked at Thornfield. I was about sixteen years old.
It was a great time there… I had much to do there, much work, but Thornfield was absolutely the place I like best from all the places I’ve ever worked. I liked the surrounding there and also the people. At first, my life at Thornfield was quiet. My only companions were my pupil, Adele, the young French ward of the absent Mr. Rochester, and Mrs. Fairfax; which I would describe as a kind, simple and unimaginative elderly widow. She was Mr. Rochester’s housekeeper and I really liked her. She was always very frank to me and I liked the friendly way she treated Adele and me. That was something new and special to me. But all changed, as one day Edward Rochester, the owner of the manor, arrived. At that time he was about thirty-eight, dark haired, dark eyed, and ruggedly athletic.
First I hadn’t much to do with him, he was finally my employer. I liked him since I’ve seen him the first time but all the time he seemed to me a little bit mysterious. I don’t know why.
But one day, as Mr. Rochester sought out my company more frequently, I came to understand and respect him even more and we became good friends. The days, months and finally years in Thornfield died away. But one day, I found myself falling in love with my own employer.
I felt this already a long time ago, since I saw Edward the first time, but I even did not wanted to disavow my feelings for him. Finally my lovesickness for him got even stronger, from day to day. I decided to stop living like this way for a longer time; the feelings for Mr. Rochester made me sick. But I could not say to my own employer that I love him, in no way!!! Never!
And furthermore I was sure that he does not feel the same for me! It was such a horrible time…and it became even worse! A month later, I tried to commit suicide. I was at the end of my energy! But I couldn’t accomplish it!!! My love for him was much stronger than myself! The only way I still had was, to admit him my feelings.
I wasn’t scared anymore. I felt free…
I sat in my room for three days… only drinking, eating and sleeping. I thought about how I can say Mr. Rochester what I have to say him… but before I could say anything I heard a voice out of my door, the voice shouted:” Jane! I LOVE YOU! I know everything! Please, come out of the room… I LOVE YOU!!!!!”
I can remember this scene very well.
A few minutes passed, and I wasn’t sure if I dreamed or not! I thought I’ve heard him… but I was also sure that this was not possible. First I did not believed my ears, all seemed to me like a long dream, like one of those many I had every night, one of them who made me sick, who slowly sucked me out internal!
I kept shut my ears. I did not believe but my eyes showed me the opposite!
It was essentially Mr. Rochester! I asked him again a few times, he always answered the same!
He loved me the whole time and I idiot didn’t recognise it.
I got a proposal of marriage and about a week later we married…
I hope our love will never end… I will love him until I close my eyes forever…
This was the story about my never ending first love.
Thursday, 19 April 2007
PROSTITUTE KILLED BY HER OWN PIMP
Mysterious killing of a young prostitute
This was surly no common murder. The corps of her showed sign of brutally killing, it is assumed that this was not roughly a “normal” murder, no; it was a murder with many coherences.
It was the night of the 1st of August, when Nancy P. was killed. The police assume that her lover, Bill Sikes, was the murderer because he is the only one who eventually had a reason to kill her. The detectives mean that because of Sikes, Nancy P. had also contacts to a most wanted burglar-gang.
Her dead body was found by Rose, also a prostitute and a good friend of
She shocked told reporters:” It was at around eleven o’clock in the morning, as I wanted to visit
Sam Pope, seemingly a neighbour and good friend of the two told:” I can not believe this all! I know Nancy and Bill about five or six years… they were always very friendly to me. I have never heard them quarrelling… and I have also never heard some bad things about Bill, least of all that he is a pander. That all seems to me unbelievable… I really don’t think that it could be Bill who killed